Richard Russell
continues:
“The problem with Bernanke's theory is that the
economic world is caught in a massive world-wide cycle of deflation -- more
goods produced than can be consumed. Normally, the deflationary trend would
fully express itself through a primary bear market that would get rid of the
weak hands and those who don't deserve to survive. This would result in stocks
declining to the point where they would once again represent great values.
The theory espoused by the world's central banks is
that they can control the planet's economic cycles. Actually, I believe what is
happening is that the seemingly endless flood of fiat currency is creating a
series of bubbles, which, in the course of time, is fated to burst. The
bursting of these various bubbles will result in the bear market being far worse
than would otherwise have been the case. As Shakespeare put it, “What fools
these mortals be.”
Following the 1929 crash, the stock market embarked
on a huge recovery that lasted into early 1930. Most present-day analysts are
very familiar with the 1929-30 episode. So today's stock market had to do
something different in order to draw retail investors (and pros) back in to the
market.
What the market did this time was to produce an even
bigger and longer-lasting post-crash recovery. The recovery has lasted far
longer than most experts expected and has carried the Dow within 500 points of
its 2007 record high.
The 2008-09 bear market decline was swift and
violent. It was over almost before most investors knew what had hit them.
According to the law of alternation, the next bear market decline should be just
the opposite in character of the 2008-09 decline. The next decline should be
slow and lazy, with stocks sinking in a deceptive, leisurely manner, sinking in
a lazy way that scares nobody.”
“The US gold coverage ratio, which measures the
amount of gold on deposit at the Federal Reserve against the total money supply,
is currently at an all-time low of 17%. This ratio tends to move dramatically
and falls during periods of disinflation or relative price stability. The
historical average for the gold coverage ratio is roughly 40%, meaning that the
price of gold would have to more than double to reach the average. The gold
coverage ratio has been there twice during the twentieth century. Were this to
happen today, the value of an ounce of gold would exceed $12,000.” Scott Minerd,
analyst, courtesy Investment Rarities, Inc."
No comments:
Post a Comment