"Following the highly scrutinized
meeting between President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
earlier this month in Washington, consensus held that Obama had managed to
secure assurances from the war-hungry Netanyahu that Israel would delay a
military strike against Iran till 2013. That is, till after the November U.S.
presidential election.
According to the Israeli daily
Maariv, this commitment of Israeli “restraint” had been bought with the
sale of U.S. “advanced bunker-busting bombs and long-range refueling planes” to
the Israeli Defense Forces, as al-Akhbar (3/8) reported. Needless to say,
such advanced weaponry would be required in any Israeli attack on Iran.
“You shall still have your war,” Obama
thus seemingly sought to convey to Netanyahu, “but only in due time.”
Since the Obama-Netanyahu summit,
however, indications of such Israeli restraint have dissipated. The Israeli
dogs of war are not so easily tamed. In fact, in his latest column for Bloomberg (3/19), the Atlantic’s
Jeffrey Goldberg reports that talk of striking Iran is once more convulsing
through the Israeli political establishment. And according to Goldberg, all
such discussions have assumed a rather optimistic bent.
“One conclusion key officials have
reached,” Goldberg writes, “is that a strike on six or eight Iranian facilities
will not lead, as is generally assumed, to all-out war.”
We learn further that Israeli
officials interpret Obama’s claims of “having Israel’s back” as meaning that
even in the event of an Israeli strike against Iran in the face of U.S. protest,
“Obama would move immediately to help buttress Israel’s defenses against an
Iranian counterstrike.”
All this leaves Goldberg to assess
that Israel shall ultimately strike Iran. As he writes, “I’m highly confident
that Netanyahu isn’t bluffing—that he is in fact counting down to the day when
he will authorize a strike against a half-dozen or more Iranian nuclear
sites.”
This unnerving assessment mirrors that
held by another favored media conduit for Israeli propaganda, Ronen Bergman, who
after similarly speaking with senior Israeli leaders earlier this year,
concluded in the New York Times Magazine (1/25) that,
"Israel will indeed strike Iran in 2012."
Notably, Goldberg’s Bloomberg
piece appeared the very day the New York Times (3/19) reported on a secret
U.S. war game held earlier this month. The war game reportedly simulated an
Israeli strike on Iranian nuclear facilities. And as the Times reported,
the exercise “forecasts that the strike would lead to a wider regional war,
which could draw in the United States and leave hundreds of Americans
dead.”
(The report did not specify to any
detail on the expected regional war unleashed by an Israeli strike. Nor did the
paper mention any projection of potential Iranian casualties. But why would
they? After all, as U.S. Gen. Tommy Franks averred back in 2002: “We don’t do
body counts.”)
And of course, where there is smoke,
there is fire..."
No comments:
Post a Comment